fence
/fɛns/ [fens] Show IPA noun, verb,fenced, fenc·ing.
–noun
a barrier enclosing or bordering a field, yard, etc., usually made of posts and wire or wood, used to prevent entrance, to confine, or to mark a boundary.
That’s ‘ole man Webster’s definition of that which can divide our property, harness our horses, or make for bad neighbors. Cyclone (yuk) or Split Rail, it usually has but one of two jobs… contain or keep out. Unless one happens to be a politician. It is then that we all can see the ancillary benefit of having put up a fence; and one certain politicos well take advantage of: To sit on.
The fence is usually a safe perch from which a legislator can gauge – or attempt to gauge – how the voters may come down on a certain issue (or issues), and a position from which to play both sides against the middle. And once he/she has corralled the trust and support of the populace he/she can then employ the fences of their North 40 to secure and maintain that patronage.
Unless someone leaves open the back door to the barn.
This rural metaphor – and lesson – has begun to come home to roost with The King these days as his well chronicled penchant for coming down on both sides of an issue has him exhibiting more personas than Sybil. One almost wonders these days which Castle will exit from the Cadillac – The affable politico who stands for the applause and photo op while standing next to a Really Big Check (the 2.4 mil he was puffin his chest out over securing for a Newark tech company) or the cunning party apostle that actually had voted a fortnight prior to shelve the funding that made the Really Big check possible. Huh? Confused yet? Well welcome to the world of today’s moderate (See wishy washy or ambiguously indirect … (yes, we know its redundant) – take your pick.
Seems the way of the moderate (progressive Republican) in a modern political landscape loaded with landmines (financial and otherwise), is mapped by such intentions. Navigational acuity is required if one is to keep all political limbs intact. The King has had such skill sets but they are eroding… as is the latitude provided by reputation and years of service. And in a down economy where even the most trifling subsidies, paltry scraps of pork, and relatively unsubstantial earmarks loom huge for a State in need, and at a time where an incumbent’s popularity holds as much predictability as last weekends weather, Mike has picked a whale of a time to 86 the 1% of Fed Spending that would find its way into the light pockets of say… The Ministry of Caring and Mary Campbell Center and their slew of needy constituents. But, hey… “we gotta start cutting costs, say the GOP drones, and we’s gonna start now… and the King will vote with us… then tell you how that same 1% was his doing in years pastso it don’t sting so bad”
Heya, Mike; this was one of those times ya could’ve really looked like someone who withstood the call of the party siren and stood with the peeps who put him in office. We know ya want to.
We like ya, Mike… lots of folks do… and we know you know that voters more often than not (that is when they’re not in the grips of manufactured fear) vote their pocketbooks. And while yes, the Dems tend to spend first, ask questions later, they may have a point here… and they’re gonna sharpen it.
The blatant party tow-line act ain’t helpin’ ya. We have quite a few serious financial, environmental, and constitutional issues comin’ right at ya that will require a solid two legged stance right on the American soil. Maybe its time ya ponied up, closed the barn door, and hopped off that fence. You’ll get a lot more support for taking a real stand then you’ve been told by those who built that fence.

