“The optimist sees the rose and not its thorns; the pessimist stares at the thorns, oblivious to the rose” - Kahlil Gibran -
If optimism were a campaign run in Delaware then Rose Izzo would be the poster girl. She defiantly ain’t lookin’ at the thorns surrounding her run for a big ticket office… The House. This expo will not be especially kind, but neither will her opposition (assuming she ever files and subsequently announces) or the realities of raising her virtual image and enough cash to play this game. She will learn that meeting the Delaware Republican Committee is not “news” and that not being a Delawarean is news. As we’ve pointed out in other essays, this is a regrettable mindset of the provincial Delaware voter which we will forever be looking to alter. But in Rose’s case it is the least of her problems. What is Rose’s problem is that no one… and I mean no one has a clue as to who this girl is and what it is that makes her believe she can run for, and win, the opportunity to get smoked by John Carney in November.
Well we are gonna take a lookie here and provide a glimpse into this world that Rose’s supporters have probably not made her privy too. We do believe Rose knows the realities and is way smart enough to face them head on… cause they’re not goin’ away, and neither are we… So here goes, Rose
ROSE IZZO – Peruse her web site – which is the only sight we see of her – and one finds the normal republican mantras; Cutting taxes (good luck with that one); Smaller government (good luck widdat too); Family values – when anyone can finally fully explain that awfully broad and hard to pin down political idom?… I mean, don’t we all have family values? …or is this exclusively a GOP vernacular? …as in only conservatives possess such an ideal. And, of course she trots out …A Strong military. Now we too favour a strong military, but does Rose, an aspiring leader, possess the knowledge that can take a tag line from rhetorical to refined? Does she have an accessible command of what the military actually does (besides attack bad guys), and the labyrinth of complexities that are woven throughout our armed services? Would she be able to provide a well balanced dissertation on SOCOM and its command structure for US special ops deployment? Can she recite which branches Delta force, Rangers, Green Berets, Night Stalkers and SEALs belong to? Or provide us her extensive knowledge on the methods and interworking of the highly specialized and mysterious band of ally clandestine entities; Britain’s MI-5 and SIS or Israel’s Masad? How bout her exploits or knowledge of precisely how the Pentagon operates. Has she ever been to the Pentagon? Perhaps we would better suited on hearing her lecture on covert night ops in Kabul. Or how the 2001 USS Cole incident and the lack of a fierce US response (Both Clinton and Bush 43 were criticized) has been linked as reason for the 9-11 attack.
Why, you ask are we (DE2010)too in such attack mode? Poor Rose blah blah blah. Because we tire of the “get tough” on this and “get tough” on that rhetoric that plays well with the public in a sound bite and is repeated by a base that couldn’t answer any of these questions either. I’m just sayin’ that if you, as a Congressional Candidate are gonna say it you ought to really know what you’re talking about. Rose Izzo or any other pol. Maybe you do, Rose, and if so, we surrender the high ground… but be honest.
And lest we forget what may be a harbinger as to her possible political naiveté: “No back room deals”. Hmmmm, interesting. We do have a lil news flash for Rose… that’s the only room of the house where deals are made… I’m just sayin… She also has cloaked her online presence and persona around the ghost of the “Gipper”; connecting her own leadership to that of our 40th president. Pretty lofty comparison we’d say …pretty ballsy too. But hey, we all have our heroes, and Ronnie did have a knack for pissing off the Russians and Democrats alike (by somehow linking the party name to his own… Reagan Democrats.
And what analysis of any GOP hopeful would not be complete without the “Fiscal Sanity” tag? Are we to suppose that those who debate as to what constitutes fiscal sanity are badly in need of shock therapy? Hell, maybe they are… lol. But then again, when one gets past the getting comfy in their DC digs stage they are reminded by reality that things cost money …all things. And cutting things aint popular …and politicians like being popular…
Now that we’ve got the “tough” part out of the way we would be remiss should we not mention her qualities. She is well respected, intelligent, congenial and has a huge heart. Nice features all but with little in the resume department it’s not nearly enough. We believe she believes in her lofty aspirations and we certainly wish her well. There are also legitimate merits to the platform she adheres to. Nobody wants more government and we would all would like lower taxes. Actually I agree with her Forbes-like stand for a flat tax, but that too will never see the light of day …neither will lower taxes …neither will less government. We have fed this monster for too long and now it is waaaaaay out of control. But it doesn’t hurt to make a stand.
We do have some advice for Mrs Izzo. Get someone professional to produce your site and write your web content. It’s ok to mention you were not born in Delaware (not really, but we’re being nice) but don’t include when you moved to Pennsylvania and not when you moved to Delaware. Also, being politically active does not somehow qualify you for Congress. You seem to run for elected office (5 listed) but not a win in the lot. And we wouldn’t recommend listing who you supported i.e. Bill Lee (even though we like him and feel he would have made a fine Gov) as it comes off like your support was a qualification and that it in fact mattered. It didn’t. Try running for County Council, Rose. Get your feet wet before you attempt to make such a run… k?
Finally, if you are truly serious about your candidacy than you got to hop in the race, lady. Maybe you can prove us wrong and go from obscurity to Washington. Miracles do happen but not to a Brooklynite… in Delaware… sorry. But good luck and thanks for playing.



February 9th, 2010 at 11:15 pm
Jeez, I guess it’s pretty evident DE2010 writers are Coo-Coo for Carney! I’m just sayin.’ This candidate has no chance to win unless Carney somehow was a summer intern for Earl Bradley back in the day. That said, It should be a requirement for anyone who seeks congressional office to have wide appeal and the requisite political chops to back it up.
Remember, however, John Carney lost to Markell even though he and every other long-time DE Dem though Thine Lord Carney had a divine right to the Gov’s seat. Career politicians aren’t in vogue anymore (i.e., Kennedy’s and Biden’s seats). Perhaps we are on a Road to Serfdom and the Kings, Queens and Camelot wannabe’s are beginning to smell a little Revolution in the air.
February 10th, 2010 at 1:46 am
Coo-Coo for Carney, eh? Interesting observation should one be on crack. We simply call it as it is. None of the pretenders have a shot at getting out of the gate let alone beat the guy. And you haven’t read evidently as we’ve blasted the old guard and called out the anointed ones as well as a political environment that recognizes and rewards such the lineage while penalizing the upstart. We’re pretty much on the record and have not made many friends in either Carney’s or Castles camp…so what’s your point?
Now when we talk Wedo or Copeland (whenever either of those fellows grace us with an announcement) it will be another story entirely… and one I thought you would have known. Yes, the Markell whuppin was a blindside to Carney as was the overpass for the empty senate seat, but unless I too am under the influence or the entire political globe has been thrown off its axis, the last time I looked Carney was a prohibitive favourite. Now if you truly believe that Scott Brown’s coattails will ignite a fire of revolt that will propel Izzo, Cullis, Wade etc. into the House over Carney than have at it…but bet your own money, bro.
And as far as the wide appeal and poli chops? You see any of the pretenders with either of those?…didn’t think so. When they grow some let us know. In the meantime I guess your gonna love our critique of the rest of the gang…
February 10th, 2010 at 5:36 am
Finally someone said it. Looks like yall prompted Ron Williams to address it this morning:
http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20100210/OPINION05/2100317/1004/OPINION
February 10th, 2010 at 7:24 am
Sigh………………
This chick is clueless but living proof that anybody can still run for office.
The GOP will botch this by waiting for Charlie and waiting for Charlie who will lose to the blue collar kid from Claymont and therefore be done. 2 strikes and your out.
Gonna call Wedo back today. The RNCC and he met last week. See how it went.
February 10th, 2010 at 8:37 pm
Look at the way she cropped her photo, maybe on Microsoft Paint? LOLOLOLOLLL!
February 11th, 2010 at 10:13 am
She should run for PTA, what is this woman thinking!?
February 26th, 2010 at 7:01 am
This is certainly my initial stop by and I really like what I’m seeing. Your weblog is so much fun to look over, quite compelling as well as informative. I’ll undoubtedly recommend it to my friends. Nevertheless, I did have some problem with the commenting. It kept giving me an problem whenever I clicked on publish comment. I hope, that can be fixed. Many thanks